Home

Set the Line Before It's Crossed

Be prepared to act when the time comes.


Contents


Lines Will Move Further Away If They Aren't Defined

Three types of lines exist in the policy and behavior sense:

Most lines are rarely set and rarely thought about in detail. Most line setters use the good ol' "I know it when I see it" test, waiting for something to happen before they decide what to do. This is a poor practice because of the pernicious force known as normalization of deviance.

When lines aren't set before they're crossed, it forces a decision to be made at the time of crossing (if it can even be recognized that something was crossed!), during which many things can happen:

By setting a line and its corresponding action early, the action becomes the default until proven otherwise. This is similar to trigger-action plans.


How to Set a Line

Here's the general process of setting a line:

  1. Figure out the general line. Whether it's domestic abuse, talking smack, donating money, or rights being restricted or outright revoked, it must be defined.
  2. Define the criteria for both the soft, firm, and/or hard versions, but especially the hard. The soft line being crossed serves as a forewarning to the hard line being crossed, giving ample preparation time for if the hard line is eventually crossed. The criteria must be well-defined with little room for interpretation.
  3. Decide how many times each can be crossed before the action is taken. It's fine to give someone a stern reminder that they crossed the line in case they forgot, weren't aware of the line, weren't aware that it was soft/firm/hard, etc. It's not fine for it to happen more than the set number allows, especially if previous actions were taken.
  4. Define the actions for each line. This can also be done in conjunction with deciding the number of times it can be violated, since more drastic actions should have fewer subsequent violations and thus a lower number of allowable violations.
  5. Define what circumstances would have to be present for the action not to be taken. What evidence would it take to show that the hard line was crossed, but the action shouldn't be taken? (This is a bit contradictory to how hard line is defined above, but the hard line action is simply the default, not a blind requirement that must be executed. Setters should double-check they didn't miss something before taking the default action.)
  6. Communicate the lines and actions to people who either may be at risk of crossing them or will help with maintaining accountability of executing said actions.
  7. Prepare for taking the action when/if the time comes. Preparation may be mental, physical, or environmental.

Ensuring Accountability

The line means nothing—and in reality, is likely a large cost—if the action is never performed when it should be. Assuming the fourth and fifth steps are done honestly and comprehensively, it should be clear what decision needs to be made when the line is crossed.

Thus, an accountability method must be put in place to enforce the action being taken.

A few ideas that all rely on the honor system to some extent:


Line Examples

Here are some hard line ideas and associated actions (in no particular order; assume the case is straightforward with no nuance):

Government Overreach

Relationships

Workplace

Health


See Also